14U Boys



Power Rankings


14U Boys Power Rankings Tier I

RANK TEAM NAME POWER AVG W L RkPts WVU WVS WVL LVU LVS LVL
1 Attack Academy 2012 Boys - Black 46.3 6 0 278 0 6 0 0 0 0
2 Junior Bisons 2012 Boys 37.3 4 2 224 0 4 0 0 2 0
3 REFRESH 2012 Boys - SOLIVEN 37.3 5 1 224 0 3 2 0 1 0
4 Relentless 2012 Boys - East 14U 34.0 2 1 102 0 1 1 0 1 0
5 Relentless 2012 Boys - West 32.0 3 0 96 0 0 3 0 0 0
6 Empire 2012 Boys - Gold 30.3 4 2 182 0 1 3 0 2 0
7 Magic 2012 Boys 28.0 2 2 112 0 0 2 0 2 0
8 Downtown Dawgs 2012 Boys 27.3 3 3 164 0 1 2 0 3 0
9 SUMMIT 2012 BOYS 22.9 2 5 160 0 0 2 0 5 0

14U Boys Power Rankings Tier II

RANK TEAM NAME POWER AVG W L RkPts WVU WVS WVL LVU LVS LVL
1 Rising Star 2012 Boys 41.6 5 0 208 0 4 1 0 0 0
2 Relentless 2013 Boys - East 37.3 5 1 224 0 3 2 1 0 0
3 DElite 2012 Boys 31.3 1 2 94 0 1 0 2 0 0
4 Empire 2012 Boys - Black 29.0 3 3 174 0 2 1 0 3 0
5 Attack Academy 2012 Boys - Red 28.0 1 4 140 0 1 0 3 1 0
6 Crossover 2012 Boys 26.7 2 4 160 0 1 1 1 3 0
7 REFRESH 2012 Boys - VEGA 25.7 2 4 154 0 1 1 1 3 0
8 Empire Boys 2012 - White 23.6 1 4 118 0 0 1 1 3 0

14U Boys Power Rankings Tier III  

RANK TEAM NAME POWER AVG W L RkPts WVU WVS WVL LVU LVS LVL
1 PBL Select 2012 Boys 42.4 4 1 212 0 4 0 1 0 0
2 REFRESH 2013 Boys 35.0 4 2 210 0 4 0 0 2 0
3 Ignite 2013 Boys 35.0 4 2 210 0 4 0 0 2 0
4 Evolve 2012 Boys 30.7 2 4 184 0 2 0 3 1 0
5 DElite 2012 Boys - Black 29.7 2 4 178 0 2 0 3 1 0
6 DElite 2012 Boys - Red 29.5 1 3 118 0 1 0 2 1 0
7 Team Mayhem 2012 Boys 26.0 2 4 156 0 2 0 1 3 0
8 Ambush 2012 Boys 23.7 2 5 166 0 2 0 1 4 0
9 Selkirk Junior Royals 2012 Boys 20.8 1 4 104 0 1 0 0 4 0
10 Moose Lake 2012 Boys 18.3 0 6 110 0 0 0 2 4 0

 
 We use the Power Ranking Formula to ensure the most fair and accurate seeding for the championship tournament. Here's why:
  1. Cross-Divisional and Cross-Tier Games:

    • Throughout the season, teams play against opponents from different divisions and tiers. This creates variability in the level of competition faced by each team.
  2. Strength of Schedule:

    • The formula considers the difficulty of each team's schedule. A win against a higher-tier or higher-ranked team is weighted more heavily than a win against a lower-tier team.
    • This ensures that teams are rewarded for performing well against stronger competition.
  3. Balanced Assessment:

    • By using the formula, we avoid simple win-loss records as the sole determinant for seeding. Instead, the formula provides a more nuanced evaluation of team performance, taking into account both the quality of opponents and the outcomes of the games.
This system ensures that the tournament seeding reflects the true competitive standing of each team, promoting fairness and rewarding teams that excel against tougher opponents.
 
Ranking Formulation:
  • Award 50 points for a win over an upper tier opponent.
  • Award 20 points for a loss to an upper tier opponent.
  • Award 40 points for a victory over a same tier opponent.
  • Award 10 points for a loss to a same tier opponent.
  • Award 30 points for a win over a lower tier team.
  • Award 0 points for a loss to a lower tier team.
  • A forfeiture is a win for the team receiving the forfeiture and a loss for the team that does the forfeiting.
  • Each team receives 2 bonus points per each opponent wins regardless of class and the number of times played during regular season.
  • Divide the total number of points by the total number of regular season point-producing games played to determine mathematical point average.

Teams




RAMP Registration

Join thousands of association partners using RAMP Registration Solutions.

More Information

RAMP Official Assigning

#1 with Officials...for very good reasons.

More Information

RAMP Websites

Manage your identity from the palm of your hand to the top of your desk.

More Information

RAMP Team App

Keep your coaches, parents, athletes, and fans connected, seamlessly.

More Information